AUS vs IND First test - Statistical washup - Pujara played out of his skin.

Well India takes first blood as I predicted. Played well. Australia stayed in it, but our top order looks dicey.




Wanted to perform a statistical analysis about who played the best. So I turn to my trusty friend, the z-score (score-average/SD), to give me the good oil.




On the batting, if I calculate the z-score on total runs...we only have 3 players who batted with a z-score of over 0.5 (which is my benchmark for quality play)




CA Pujara: z-score of 3.1!!!
TM Head - z-score of 1
AM Rahane - z-score of 0.93




On the poor performing side we have 5 players who had poor batting displays




JR Hazlewood: z-score of -0.83
AJ Finch: z-score of -0.89
Mohammed Shami: z-score of -1.02
I Sharma: z-score of -1.07
JJ Bumrah: z-score of  -1.17




Finch had a shocker. Needs to do better than this as an opening batsman. The rest are bowlers so can be forgiven.


On the bowling side, if I calculate the z-score on wickets/runs (i.e the inverse of average), we get the following over 0.5




JJ Bumrah: z-score of 1.17!!
MA Starc: z-score of 0.96
JR Hazlewood: z-score of 0.60
Mohammed Shami: z-score of 0.52




On the poor performing side we have




PJ Cummins: z-score of -0.68
TM Head: z-score of -1.76
M Vijay: z-score of -1.76




Again, Cummins had a shocker. The other 2 are not established bowlers so are forgiven. Funny that Lyon is not included, with his 8 wickets, but he bled a lot of runs.


So the difference really was in the batting. Pujara played at 3 Standard Deviations better than the rest. Can't get too much better than that.


Bowling was pretty equal, but Cummins was poor.













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Percentage of women in Australia with Breast Implants :- Maximum of 4% of female population 18+

Labor's Shared Home ownership scheme...creating another Commbank?

Top 20 ranked Soccer sides potentially going to be knocked out of the group stages of World Cup