Valuing the ASX200 using the Gordon Growth Model - Seems undervalued

Still studying for my CFA Level 2 Exam (rapidly approaching in June) and came across that old friend, The Gordon Growth Model formula. What was new however, is using it to value indexes. So I decided to apply it to the ASX200.

As most of you know, the GGM formula is (Price today) = (Dividend Next Year)/((Rate of Return)-(Growth))

Using RBA figures, we have the average dividend yield over the last 2.5 years as being 4.6%. Applying that to the 1 April value of the ASX200 = 4931 we have a dividend today of 231.80. Assuming a growth rate of 3.25% (OECD forecast), that means next years dividend = 239.33.

Now to our rate of return. Using ASX200 daily returns since November 2010 (the usual 2.5 years), we have an average daily return of 0.0128%. Multiplied by the 256 trading days, we have an yearly return of 3.26%. Add on that dividend yield and we get 7.86% being our total market return.

10 year bond rate average over that same 2.5 yearly period gives us a risk free rate of 4.15%

Using CAPM (with the ASX200 Beta =1) we have a rate of return being 4.15+1* (7.86-4.15) =7.86%

Using g = 0.0325, therefore the ASX value should be 239.33/(7.86-0.0325) = 5183.

Therefore, with April's value of ASX200 being 4931, it appears by this definition that the index is undervalued by around 5%. Could also explain why the index has grown to 5100 today as people start to see the value.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Percentage of women in Australia with Breast Implants :- Maximum of 4% of female population 18+

Labor's Shared Home ownership scheme...creating another Commbank?

Top 20 ranked Soccer sides potentially going to be knocked out of the group stages of World Cup